# pcb-rnd devlog

## back annotation

### netlists, annotations

Pcb-rnd (and mainline pcb) maintains a netlist as part of the design. Pcb doesn't modify the netlist. The netlist is imported from an external source, typically from gschem. This process is called forward annotation.

Sometimes there are a set of connections which contain pin pairs that could be swapped. For example the data lines of an external parallel SRAM interface to an MCU: it doesn't matter if data bit 1 at the MCU is wired to data bit 1 or 5 of the SRAM, as there is an 1:1 mapping and no one else is using the same bus wires. In this case connections should be swapped during pcb routing and annotated back to gschem so that the schematics can be updated. Both paths are illustrated below.

Forward annotation passes on complete netlists along arrows forward1 and forward2. Back annotation would pass back netlists, changes or modification requests on the back1, back2 path. Gnetlist takes sch files to extract and build a netlist in whatever format the receiver needs. There should be a glue layer, called foo on the drawing, that does the reverse: receives whatever format the sender has and generates something that gschem will understand.

### Support in pcb-rnd: core

Pcb-rnd gets a complete netlist. If the user could change the netlist directly, there should be some sort of diff tool in foo that can explain the changes to gschem, or a diff tool in gschem. What is worse, forward annotation happens much more often than back annotation and pcb-rnd would need to be able to merge a new netlist with local changes. The simple "gsch2pcb overwrites the netlist in pcb from whatever gnetlist produced" approach would not work.

An alternative is to keep the netlist as-is, and maintain a separate list of changes. The form proposed hereby is a table of "operation,pinID,net" or "operation,args...". Netlist operation is one of "del_conn", "add_conn" and "net_info". The table is called the netlist patch.

For example assume two components with pins A1, A2 and B1, B2, with connections n1=A1-B1 and n2=A2-B2. While routing the designer decides changing them to n1=A1-B2 and n2=A2-B1 would be easier and is acceptable by the design. The table of changes would contain this:

op | pinID | net
--- | --- | ---
del_conn | B1 | n1
del_conn | B2 | n2
add_conn | B2 | n1
add_conn | B1 | n2

The first two lines would remove pins B1 and B2 from n1 and n2. The last two would put them back, swapped. New nets could be created or unused nets could be removed using the add_net and del_net commands that have empty pinID. The table is ordered, rows are strictly executed from top to bottom.

Pcb-rnd would store this table in memory. When some code calls the netlist code to find out the members of a net, or which net a given pin is connected to, after running the original netlist code, the result would be adjusted by the table.

The table would be normalized after operations. For example:

op | pinID | net
--- | --- | ---
del_conn | B1 | n1
add_conn | B1 | n2
add_conn | B1 | n3
del_conn | B1 | n2

would be reduced to

op | pinID | net
--- | --- | ---
del_conn | B1 | n1
add_conn | B1 | n3

Simple linear crawls on the table seems sufficient: it is expected that pcb designers will make netlist modifications rarely and they will back annotate them ASAP. In extreme cases there may be 64 bit wide bus systems that need total reordering; even a 4 such reorders will introduce about 1024 items on the list which seems not too big for O(1) algorithms. See section TODO for better approaches.

Pcb-rnd would save the normalized table in the pcb file in a new section. Upon a netlist change in pcb (import/load netlist or load the pcb), pcb-rnd would check each row of the table: it is easy to decide whether that row has been implemented in the netlist or not. Obsolete rows of the table would be deleted.

A corner case is when B1 is removed from n1 and then added to n2 by the table, while a new forward annotation removes B1 from n1 and adds it to n3. In this case the first row of the table is deleted, as B1 is already removed from n1, but pcb-rnd has no chance to decide if netlist adding B1 to n3 should affect the table adding B1 to n2, so that rule is kept.

net_info is used to describe the original members of a net, in the state they were before any change on the netlist occurred.

### Support in pcb-rnd: GUI

A trivial idea is to extend the netlist window so that pins can be moved in between nets or deleted or assigned to nets. Changes should be marked. This is not the preferred way of editing the netlist, tho: not much more convenient than making changes in gschem and doing forward annotation.

There should be a separate dialog box or a separate region of the netlist box showing the netlist patch with edit capabilities.

Finally, the most important feature would be new actions resolving shorts. Using the above example (n1=A1-B1 and n2=A2-B2 changed to n1=A1-B2 and n2=A2-B1), I believe the user would:

action | screenshot | patch list after the actions
--- | --- | ---

- look at initial rats

(empty)

- first connect A1 to B1

(empty)

- then realize it's very hard to connect A2 to B2 while the previous connection is there
- he would then revert the first connection
- and connect A1 to B2
- which would cause shorts

(empty)

- then he would use the "approve netlist change" hotkey/action on the network; this would add netlist patch commands for the A1-B2 connection, but would also keep the A1-B1 connection, which remains a rat; because of the new connection there'd be a rat between A1 and A2 or B1 and B2 too (all 4 pins connected together on the patched netlist at the moment!)

    net_info n1 A1 B1
    net_info n2 A2 B2
    del_conn B1 n1
    add_conn B1 n2

- the user would then use an action (maybe the same one?) on the rat line so that pcb-rnd would understand that rat is not needed anymore and would add a patch to remove the A1-B1 connection
- the same thing would need to happen to the A2-B2 rat

    net_info n1 A1 B1
    net_info n2 A2 B2
    del_conn B1 n1
    add_conn B1 n2
    del_conn B2 n2

- the user then would connect A2 to B1, which again is a short

- the user would approve it as a new connection
- we have exactly 2 del_conn and 2 add_conn patches.

    net_info n1 A1 B1
    net_info n2 A2 B2
    del_conn B1 n1
    add_conn B1 n2
    del_conn B2 n2
    add_conn B2 n1

An experienced user may think a few steps in advance and chose to first remove the A1-B1 and A2-B2 rats and then create the A1-B2 and A2-B1 connections and then approve the two new connections.

An alternative is drag&drop ratline endpoint onto snap points; it may be tricky to convert that to net/pin relations if a rat line is between two line segments, tho.

These changes would live immediately, leaving the board free of shorts and rats. There should be, however, some warning in the "congratulation" message that tells the user a back annotation is still required.

### Support in gschem

Ideally there should be a very small change in gschem and an optional plugin script could do the rest. The plugin script would be in contant with foo.

There are multiple ways pins can be connected to a net in gschem. It's probably not a good idea to have too much automatism in the gschem's side, trying to actually removing connections and adding new ones using the patch (or whatever info foo converted the patch into).

However, gschem should support four things natively:

- it should have a concept of an unwanted pin-network connection; a connection becomes unwanted only when the back annotation says so
- it should be able to mark unwanted connections on the active schematic page
- it should be able to tell the user if there are unwanted connections on any of the pages open
- it should be able to refresh its idea of unwanted connections while schematic pages are open

Displaying unwanted connections happen at:

- a pin of a component is connected to a net using a "blue line" net: mark the pin-net connection point
- a pin is directly connected to another pin, no net line in between: mark the connection point
- a pin is connected to a net using a pin attribute: mark the pin
- TODO: are there more?

TODO: there are a lot to think over about special cases related to multipage schematics, hierarchies, slots, split symbols.

### What foo does exactly

... is not clear yet. It depends on what sort of support gschem would provide.

### Amendment 1: other parameters (1st sep)

I originally forgot to mention my other intentions in the above document: back annotate non-netlist properties. It probably happened because netlist related stuff are the hardest to solve.

There are other parameters that sometimes change during routing. A common case for my 1 or 2 layer boards is when I originally intend to use 0603 parts but during routing I figure I need to pass a trace between the pads. I need to change the part to 0805 or 1206 (for two traces). I'd like to be able to do this in-place in pcb with an action that replaces the footprint but keeps the origin in place. This obviously still requires some manual fiddling afterwards, but would remove the long, tedious chain I have now:

- 1. remember or note down which parts to change footprints for
- 2. go back to gschem and change them
- 3. get the changes in pcb (I use gsch2pcb and Makefiles, one step; the import menu is one step too, just another one)
- 4. disperse the new elements
- 5. find where they used to be
- 6. and then do the fiddling to fit them in

The new process would be:

- 1. get the footprint replaced, in-place; this would already approve the change and there'd be a command for it in the patch table
- 2. do the fiddling to fit the new part in
- 3. do a back annotation
- (4. optionally, if we go for non-automatic change of attributes in gschem, change them manually in gschem, cycling through the affected items using some UI feature)

The same thing could work for values, which is the other attribute PCB also sees. The same mechanism could work from other programs as well, e.g. tuning the values of some parts in a simulator and then back annotating the changes to the schematics. The patch table format foo handles would be in the simplest plain text form.

### Amendment 2: examples from gschem's point of view (3rd Sep)

#### netlist change

- The user creates the schematics and imports it in pcb; the original netlist contains a line "netname1 U1-1 CONN1-2"
- The user, as part of some pin swapping, decides that U1-1 should be connected to net "netname2" instead of "netname1". Changes are done in pcb-rnd as described above.
- The netlist patch generated for this single change by pcb-rnd would be:

      del_conn netname1 U1-1
      add_conn netname2 U1-1

- the user may need to load the netlist patch in gschem
- In gschem there would be an indication that highlights any U1-1 pin or U1 symbol that makes a connection to netname 1, graphically or using attributes. When asked, gschem UI would also tell the user that U1-1 is now connected to netname1 but should be connected to netname2 instead.
- The user would find this indication and would resolve the situation by whatever changes he finds appropriate
- gschem would rerun the patch commands and would figure that the del_conn fails to run because U1-1 is no longer connected to netname1 and the add_conn fails too because U1-1 is connected to netname2. This leaves U1-1 without any known issue, so the indication on U1-1 would be gone.

#### attribute change: footprint change

- The user creates the schematics and imports it in pcb; originally U1 has an attribute footprint=DIP(8).
- during the layout the user figures using the footprint SO(8) is more appropriate. He does the change in pcb-rnd.
- pcb-rnd emits the following netlist patch for this:

      change_attrib U1 footprint=DIP(8) footprint=SO(8)

  (or it could be a del_attrib and add_attrib pair, like with connections)

- the user may need to load the netlist patch in gschem
- In gschem there would be an indication that highlights any U1 instances that has footprint=DIP(8)
- The user would find this indication and would resolve the situation by whatever changes he finds appropriate (e.g. change the attribute)
- gschem would rerun the patch commands and would figure the change is no longer required and would remove the indication